Book Review – The Handmaid’s Tale

Book: The Handmaid’s Tale

Author: Margaret Atwood

Warning: strong feminism lies ahead in this post. Get out now all who do not believe in equality of the sexes.

Second warning: spoilers abound ahead. If you haven’t read The Handmaid’s Tale and do not want to have the story spoiled, please do not read this review. I was too riled after reading to attempt a spoiler-free post.

The window. The desk. The chair. Those are three sentences toward the beginning of Margaret Atwood’s novel The Handmaid’s Tale. When I read them I had to put my book down and ask myself what the heck I had gotten myself into with this story. Umm… those aren’t actual sentences. Those are nouns. What about the window, the desk and the chair? Why are you naming the things? Can you finish your thought? I didn’t understand the writing in this novel, but that may be because I opened it almost immediately after I could emotionally detach myself from the ending of A Court of Wings and Ruin by Sarah J. Maas (review coming soon).  I found the way the story jumped around between the present and the past disorienting and confusing. There were times I had to re-read parts to figure out where we were in the story.

This was a strange and haunting tale. The story was left unfinished, which actually suited it, but left me with a sense of anticipation for the climax of the story. The book is set in the post-apocalyptic world of Gilead, which came to power after a terrorist attack that killed all the members of Congress and the Executive Branch, effectively removing the sitting government from power. A fundamentalist group, the Sons of Jacob, took power under the pretext of restoring order and holding fair elections, but we (the readers) later learn the group never intended to hold elections. Rather, the Sons of Jacob fully intended on taking power of the country and changing the social structure to one inspired by Old Testament social and religious fanaticism with newly created social classes.

Through the narrator’s flash backs, we learn that the elimination of women’s rights was a quickly paced double-strike of abolishing the right to work on the same day as abolishing the right to hold a bank account. The women were angry, but pacified by the promises of the “short-term” nature of these changes and the “impending elections”. The final step in this new order took place when women were sorted into social classes based on their ability to bear children (Handmaids being the fertile, Marthas being the lower class servants and Wives being the upper class sterile). The emphasis on reproductive ability is due to declining birth rates, which are attributed to infertility caused by nuclear fallout. There it is again: the Biblical references with the naming convention and duties of each group.

If a woman is placed as Handmaid, she is assigned to a Commander for 2 years during which he attempts to impregnate her. After two years (or if she is successful – Yes. I used ‘she’ because it is the woman’s responsibility to become pregnant. Of course, men cannot be sterile! How ridiculous! – I don’t think I need to say this, but that was sarcasm, people. Sarcasm.), she is assigned to another Commander and becomes his property for another 2 years. It is essentially consensual rape. If she becomes pregnant, she is forced to give her child to the Commander’s wife to raise. What now? You would have to rip my child away from my cold, dead fingers after our fight to the death. And when you fight me, momma bear mode will be activated in all its glory.

Let’s talk about the characters’ names. The Handmaids are all stripped of their birth names and given names that are ‘of’ plus their “Commander’s name”. Offred is the narrator of the story. Offred. Of-Fred. Meaning belonging to Fred. Fred’s belonging. Property of Fred. Wait, what? Excuse me? Property? I think not.

The most interesting part of the book was the Historical Notes in the back of the book. I did a double-take when I turned onto that page and had to confirm with myself that the book is indeed fiction. The Historical Notes section actually told of why/how Gilead came to be and its’ place in history. It was explained to us the heroine’s place in Gilead’s history which I found helpful from a closure standpoint.

I chose this book for our book club last month for a few reasons. First, the content felt especially and aptly politically relevant (don’t worry, I will NOT go there). Secondly, in all my feminist readings, I hadn’t gotten around to reading this iconic tale that is on every “Books Every Woman Should Read” list. And lastly, because the show was coming out on Hulu and it looked particularly intriguing.

There were a few points during the story I tossed my book down in frustration and anger. There were times while reading I was so angry at the world of Gilead, the heroine and the other characters that I almost gave up. I found the heroine, Offred, stilted, unmoving and way too accepting of her lot.

Overall, I found the story interesting and worth the read, but it riled me. As a woman, I will tell you that if my government tried to take away my basic human rights (let’s not go there with the current political conditions, please), I would fight with everything I had in me against it. I would rage and rage and never give up the fight.

Phew. That might be my longest review yet. Ok. Feminist rant concluded. Please share your thoughts regarding The Handmaid’s Tale in the comments.

If you liked The Handmaid’s Tale, try:

Brave New World



Never Let Me Go

The Road



2 thoughts on “Book Review – The Handmaid’s Tale

  1. I have very mixed emotions about this book. I think that every woman should read this book because it is easy to become complacent and not realize what is happening until it’s too late (much like what happens to the women in this story). In order to be thankful for what we have, we must realize how vehemently others worked for those rights, and how quickly they can be taken away if we are not on our guard. This is true for not only women, but anyone in a minority group in society.

    That being said, I HATE THIS BOOK. I became so enraged, so indignant and furious that I almost didn’t finish the book. I don’t want to refer to her as “the heroine” because she does nothing heroic. She’s a passive participant in her life, who takes whatever crap she’s given placidly, without complaint. So, “the narrator” is very detached and pliant to the whims of the new government. She recounts her enslavement and the theft of her daughter with little emotion, and her behavior at the time of the separation was also quite…subdued. Let me tell you how it would go if someone tried to take my daughter from me – I’d be dead, but so would everyone else who was threatening her, and she would be free and safe. I would not go quietly, like Offred. I would not accept my fate as a Handmaid, as Offred did. I’d kill everyone before The Ceremony (read: rape) began. Everyone has to assemble for it anyway, so the need to track people down would be eliminated.

    One thing that really stuck with me (other than Offred’s story of her capture and her daughter’s snatching) was that Offred didn’t feel that The Ceremony was rape. She specifically says “it’s not rape” – I realize that this book was written in the 80’s and perhaps the definition of rape was different at that time, but this is DEFINITELY rape. Complying due to coercion with the threat of physical harm is absolutely, unequivocally, rape.

    I hated Offred. I hated how detached she was, how passive (even complicit) she was to the entire system, her treatment, the treatment of her husband, and the treatment of her daughter. After finishing the book and reflecting on it, it occurred to me that perhaps Offred’s detachment was her coping mechanism. It could be that the only way she can continue living, continue allowing herself to be used, is to become detached from who she was, and try to buy into her new role as Handmaid. That’s the only justifiable reason for her to act the way that she does.

    So, like I said in the beginning of this, I have very mixed emotions. This book is supposed to be uncomfortable. It’s supposed to make you angry. It made me very angry, so I guess its purpose was fulfilled.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Thanks for the comments, Mader! I could not agree with you more. This needs to be passed around to the people in your life and discussed so it doesn’t happen not only to women, but as you said, to anyone who is not a white man.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s